I was wondering if Mouse Guard could be used as a sort of BW lite using the mechanics with human characters. Or is this for roleplaying mice only?
Don’t be offended, I’m sure it’s a great game as is, I just haven’t read the comics and had never considered roleplaying a mouse. Also, my playing time is pretty limited and I devote all of it to medieval fantasy settings when I do get time.
I’m considering picking up the preorder anyway as anything that is even remotely related to BW is very cool in my book.
The system provides only the means to generate mouse guard characters, not even non-guard mice! There is no magic whatsoever.
You could do some work to port it, but the game is designed to be used for similar us vs. overwhelming outside forces and is not really a generic system. See some of the hacking ideas in the appropriate forum.
It could be used for humans, but you’d need to define human Nature. List three things that define “Human”…
Adapting the CGen isn’t a big issue, and it could be used just about as is for Guardsmen. Except for Critters, everything else would work in a human setting of dark ages technology from the mouse-side, but the balance of critter natures might be off. Stuff bigger than people should be fine; inbetween mouse and human probably should drop a die or two…
Get it. It is an excellent engine, at least minable for some elements to be ripped back to BW/BE…
I’m very interested in this, as I have been looking for a system like MG for a while. I’m getting tired of minis and mats and hour long rule discussions. I just want a simple streamlined system that is robust enough to hand great storytelling, and I think MG is it. Now we just need to hack it to humans…and the Nature idea is very important.
I agree that Nature can be based on culture, but I think it would be affect by upbringing as well. Perhaps we can come up with some sort of idea similar to Lifepaths which will determine a character’s nature with a series of questions. Ideas?
I’ve been musing on this subject and this is my 2 cents:
OPTIONS: Class/Occupation/Path: such as warrior, mage, rogue, paladin. Cultural identity: such as Gondor, Rohan, Eriador. Racial traits: such as elf, dwarf, orc, hobbit. Personality/Passions: being descriptors for the character. Combination: by choosing one from each catagory.
Note: any Nature descriptor that is violence-related should be carefully monitored.
My preference would be to use the last option and choose a single “descriptor” from each catagory. (Of course this also means making up a small list for each too – very time intensive).
Personality would be were the player could really cut loose and nail down their character’s inner-self.
So one could end up with a hobbit rogue from the Shire who is a bit of a troublemaker (aka. Pippin) and it would look like this:
I agree with you completely, and though creating a questionaire might be time consuming, I think it might be worth it. It would also be interesting to note that a questionaire could work well in cementing the ideas about your setting as well.
Ah, the first one I had a definite culture in mind - it’s where my parents are from - but then once I got beyond that I felt like a racist so just made something up.
I agree with you, Irminsul - I think anything that can be used directly in conflicts threatens to make a fairly potent character. (Although, that would be interesting in a predominantly social game, someone whose nature is to be physically violent.)
Combination is a fun option, but I think Nature draws a lot of its coolness from being shared - either by several players or by each player and many other NPCs. Otherwise it screws with the traits you acquire when Nature hits the top or bottom of the scale. It shouldn’t devolve into a list of character-specific personality traits.
Yes, I see that point as well. I wonder if Nature should be something more determined by setting. I think a shared Nature would work well in a setting with black and white factions, such as a Lord of the Rings type setup with Light versus Darkness.
I’m not quite sold on Nature representing cultural traits. I mean, is it really in your nature if it varies by culture? Sounds more like cultural baggage, than the more basic and primal focus of Nature found in MG.
Though, what exactly is human nature really goes into some religious and philosophical topics. I would advocate for innovation, socializing and fighting to be mixed in there. Those seem to be so intrinsically human.
I’d go with something like: Escaping, Fighting, Socializing, Crafting/Building/Innovating (can’t really decide which of the three fits best) as a first draft.
Yeah, it should work fine adding just Perception, Power and Agility (with Power being strength and toughness, and Agility being speed and dexterity), in order to keep it as simple as possible. You’ll have to decide which skills root from which attribute, and which skills to change/drop/add.
If you want to use lifepaths, I suppose you could just let each character start with a 3 in each stat, plus whatever stat bonuses they get from LPs. Derive Health, Circles and Resources like you would in BW.
Be warned, though – if your players are really lazy, they might try out DoW and Fight! and then want to go back to Mouse Guard conflicts!